Under the new framework, the Section 21 Notice is removed. That means landlords lose the current mandatory route to recover possession simply because the agreed term has ended and the statutory requirements have been met.
After the change, the Section 8 Notice becomes the main route to possession. In practice, this is likely to increase complexity, increase cost and lengthen eviction timeframes.
PIMS Practical View
The removal of Section 21 changes the balance of risk. Landlords will increasingly need to justify possession through statutory grounds, evidence and court process rather than relying on the expiry of the tenancy term.
Related PIMS pages
What changes in practice
In simple terms, tenancies move away from the old assured shorthold structure and into a model where the tenant has ongoing security of tenure unless they leave voluntarily or the landlord can satisfy the court that possession should be granted under the statutory grounds.
This means the Section 21 route disappears and the landlord becomes increasingly dependent on the Section 8 process and the court’s willingness to enforce the relevant ground.
The Government position is that the new grounds will be comprehensive, fair and efficient, balancing tenant security with the landlord’s right to manage their property.
PIMS Practical Assessment of Rent Arrears Cases
PIMS expects the most difficult area to remain rent arrears where the tenant raises a defence or counterclaim.
In theory, some arrears cases may be processed more quickly. In practice, where disrepair, Breathing Space, documentation failures or other allegations are raised, landlords may still face adjournments, extra evidence requirements and substantial delay.
PIMS has seen cases where significant arrears remained unpaid, a bailiff appointment had been made, and eviction was still delayed because of later legal intervention. Under the new framework, landlords may no longer have Section 21 as a fallback option.
PIMS Technical Concern
Where Breathing Space, disrepair allegations or other counterclaims arise, a claim presented as mandatory in theory may still become delayed in practice.
Repeated Serious Arrears Ground
One of the intended reforms is a mandatory ground for repeated serious arrears, where a tenant has been in at least three months’ arrears on three separate occasions within the previous three years, even if the arrears balance is lower by the hearing date.
PIMS notes that this may sound stronger in principle than it proves to be in practice. The notice period is extended, the court process still takes time, and judges will continue to examine the wider conduct of the parties.
At present, rent arrears claims already require careful preparation, a proper rent statement and compliance evidence. The new framework does not remove those practical realities.
- PIMS continues to recommend monthly tenancies rather than weekly tenancies.
- The tenancy agreement should state that rent is payable monthly in advance.
- Landlords should keep a complete rent history ready for court.
Anti-social Behaviour and Criminal Conduct
The Government proposes shorter notice periods in some cases involving serious anti-social behaviour or criminal conduct.
PIMS considers that this may only make a real difference if the court system itself is able to deal with those cases quickly. If hearing dates remain delayed, the change in notice length may have limited practical effect.
Grounds for Sale or Occupation by the Landlord or Family
The new framework includes a possession ground where the landlord wishes to sell the property or where the landlord or a family member intends to move into it.
PIMS considers that these grounds are understandable in principle. However, they will require careful use and should not be abused, because misuse may give rise to serious legal consequences.
New Court System and Mediation Proposals
The Government has indicated that possession reform will be accompanied by court reform, specialist process improvements and stronger mediation services.
PIMS supports the idea of a better managed possession system. However, the practical concern is whether the court infrastructure will be sufficiently improved before or at the same time as the old Section 21 route disappears.
At present, one of the major problems is not simply the legal ground itself but the handling of defended possession claims, short hearings, adjournments and counterclaims.
PIMS Practical Assessment
The Section 8 process already struggles where tenants defend claims, raise allegations or introduce counterclaims. If the same infrastructure remains in place, abolishing Section 21 may increase cost and delay rather than reduce it.
PIMS also notes that greater use of mediation may become part of the expected possession pathway. That may help in some cases, but many landlords have already attempted payment plans, warnings or negotiated solutions before serving notice.
Counterclaims and Decent Homes Allegations
PIMS expects tenant counterclaims to become more important once the landlord can no longer sidestep a contentious case by using Section 21.
- Claims of disrepair may become more common.
- Arguments about HHSRS, fitness for habitation and Decent Homes standards may increasingly be used to resist possession.
- Rent Repayment Order issues may become more relevant in defended claims.
Where the tenant argues that the property was not compliant, the landlord may face a more complex and expensive claim even where substantial arrears exist.
Periodic tenancies may also make it easier for tenants to leave unsafe or unsuitable accommodation without remaining tied into the full rent liability they would previously have faced.
PIMS View on the Loss of the Mandatory Route
PIMS does not believe the new Section 8 grounds fully replace what landlords previously had under the mandatory Section 21 route.
The old system allowed landlords to recover possession at the end of the tenancy term where the legal requirements had been met. The new system places much more weight on evidence, litigation risk, counterclaims and judicial discretion.
In PIMS’ view, that is likely to increase friction in the system and expose landlords to more delay.
PIMS Policy View
PIMS considers that the abolition of Section 21 is being driven by broader political and policy objectives rather than by the day-to-day realities faced by landlords managing problem tenancies.
PIMS also considers that many responsible landlords are being drawn into a heavier compliance model because of concern about poor practice in only part of the sector.
This does not mean the private rented sector should be unregulated. It does mean that the practical effect of the reforms may be felt most sharply by compliant landlords trying to recover possession against non-paying or difficult tenants.
PIMS Policy View
PIMS believes the court system, case management process and enforcement route should be improved before the old mandatory possession route is removed.
Questions landlords should now be asking
- Is my tenancy agreement ready for the post-Section 21 framework?
- Do I have proper rent records, service records and compliance records?
- Could my documentation withstand tenant or solicitor challenge?
- If possession becomes defended, do I have the evidence ready now?
Need support with the new eviction framework?
PIMS members receive practical landlord guidance, document support and access to the PIMS helpline.
Join PIMS