PIMS ≡
  • Facebook
  • Facebook
  • Facebook
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Join
  • Forgotten Password?

The website for Landlords and Letting Agents

  • Tenancy Agreement
  • Starting Tenancy
  • Managing Tenancy
  • Ending Tenancy
  • Legislation
  • Letting Agents
  • Latest News
  • Credit Checks
  • Latest Blog
  • Letting Flowchart
  • ABC to Lettings
  • Document Centre
  • Helpline
  • Landlords Insurance
  • EPC
  • Rent in Advance, Pre-Tenancy Payments and the Risk of Getting It Wrong
  • Should Landlords Trust British Gas - 5 Appeals
  • RENTERS RIGHTS INFORMATION SHEET - FINE £7000
  • PIMS Renters Right Compliant - ENDING a Tenancy
  • PIMS New DOCUMENT NEW SECTIONS
  • News archive >

News Article

"In May, you MUST give your Tenants the Renters Rights Information Sheet or

YOU RISK  - £7,000 FINE  PER TENANT PER PROPERTY."READ MORE

D-Day Thursday 13th for decision on legal challenge of licence scheme

5th Aug 2015

A date has been set for the decision on the legal challenge of Croydon’s licensing scheme to be Thursday 13th August (2015).



Croydon Property Forum (CPF) had requested the Royal Courts of Justice for a judicial review of Croydon Council’s proposed landlord licensing scheme and its intended charges. The council appeared in court earlier this month in defence of the legal challenge by the non profit company, CPF, which was set up by landlords to contest the scheme.

The council wanted to charge all landlords to pay £750 per rented property, from October 1st, for a five year licence to become accredited within the scheme. The council purported that by doing so it would be rid of the so-called ‘rogue landlords’, those willing to pay into the scheme would also have to undertake responsibilities of erasing anti-social behaviour.

Jonathan Manning, who represented the Croydon Property Forum, requested the High Court judge Sir Stephen Silber to allow a judicial review, because Croydon had failed to take "reasonable steps to consult every person who can be affected" by the scheme.

Manning put across the argument that during the consultation period, the council had ignored developers and had not supplied enough information to landlords.

The council had originally in the first tranche of the consultation, sent out 9,000 leaflets to landlords together with a link to an online questionnaire. This just contained an outline of the principles of the scheme and did not supply any specifics.

The council followed this up by 1,000 doorstep face-to-face random interviews and another online consultation.

Mr Manning told the court that the council did not bother to inform any developers that could be affected by the scheme; they just seemed to be targeting small landlords who had only one or two buy-to-let properties.

Manning said:"In this case, the developers who are building large quantities of housing in the borough, much which will be made available as private rent, will be affected,

"The response of a developer saying 'I won't be able to build 1,000 homes in Croydon' is qualitatively different to saying 'I was going to build one home but now I'm not'."

The barrister explained to the court that all the council had to do, to involve the developers, was simply to contact the Develop Croydon Forum.

Dr Anwar Ansari, an important property developer in the borough, said in a witness statement read out in court, that developers may "struggle" because of the proposed licensing scheme and may consider whether it was worthwhile to invest in Croydon.

Clive Sheldon QC, who represented the London Borough of Croydon, said the council’s sole intent was to make Croydon more attractive to investors.

He retorted to Dr Ansari’s statement by saying that he should have received the leaflet from the council and that: "The local authority is not required to send leaflets by recorded delivery."

Sheldon said that council was not legally obliged to have taken all reasonable steps in contacting all of the potentially affected parties. It was solely down to the council to decide what is deemed as reasonable. However he admitted that all residents, landlords and businesses should have been contacted, as after all developers are businesses.

Mr Sheldon after this admittance did blame developers for not committing the due diligence by not researching the possibilities of such a scheme being introduced.

He said:"It's common sense, any person investing tens of millions of pounds is going to want to know is this a good place for them to be buying and developing property,".

Mr Sheldon claimed that larger developers should have been aware of the impending licensing scheme, as it was included in local newspaper ads, council emails and leaflets.

He requested that Judge Silber should refuse Croydon Property Forum's application for a judicial review.

Judge Silber will make his ruling on Thursday (August 13).

News Archive »


Feedback includes"invaluable service", "Excellent", "A brilliant Website", "worthwhile joining" , "friendly and knowledgeable", "incredibly helpful", "outstanding" Read Reviews

 

 

"In May, you MUST give your Tenants the Renters Rights Information Sheet or

YOU RISK  - £7,000 FINE  PER TENANT PER PROPERTY."READ MORE

 

 

 


Starting a tenancy
Preparing to let The do's and dont's The vetting process Documents required Using a letting agent The good letting guide
Managing a tenancy
Inspections Maintenance Dealing with problems Renewing a tenancy Rent arrears Dealing with councils Rent increases
Ending a tenancy
The checkout and exit How to deal with a problem tenant Compare eviction notices Recovering debt Enforcing court orders Section 21 notice Section 8 notice
Letting legislations
Housing benefits LHA Maintenance and repair Health and safety Provision of services HMO and licensing Tenant litigation
Site index
Tenancy lifecycle Eviction flowchart Starting a tenancy docs Managing a tenancy docs Ending a tenancy docs News
MasterCard Maestro Visa Visa Electron Switch Solo JCB ePDQ
© 2023 PIMS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Join
  • Contact us

Website by OddSphere
Memberships are from only £79.95 a year or £29.95 a quarter
X
Fit for Habitation|March 2019 The ACT is intended to define minimum standards a rental property MUST be and makes a clearer pathway way for Tenants to be compensated|https://www.pims.co.uk/fit_for_habitation_act_march_2019/ Guarantor|The person who provides a guarantee and promises to make payment good should the person responsible for the agreement fail|http://www.pims.co.uk/guarantors/ MEES|The Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard (MEES) Landlords are charged with the requirement to bring their rental property to a minimum EPC rating of E. Property with F and G rating will effectively be banned from the rental market April 2018 |http://www.pims.co.uk/epc/ Section 11|Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 places an obligation on the landlord to maintain the structure and exterior of the property, including installations for the supply of water, gas and electricity, heating systems, drainage and sanitary appliances|http://www.pims.co.uk/landlord-section-11-repairs/ serving date|This date is the date deemed received at the property - as an example if posted allow for posting days|/serving-notice-on-a-tenant-delivery-days/ Tenancy Application|The objective of vetting is to empower yourself so you can make an informed decision as to the calibre of the prospective person. Making your decision on facts and figures is invaluable and this is why you should always take references. The application form also provides you with permission to perform credits. This form details all the information you should ever require deal with most eventualities including absconding tenants|http://www.pims.co.uk/doc/57/ Tenant Fees|From June 2019 where renting properties in England gone are the days of charging for admin, letting fees, vetting, references, inventory, check in, check out, cleaning, pet insurance or ANY other fee that is not explicitly permitted within the legislation. |https://www.pims.co.uk/ban_letting_fees_act_2019/