Prevention of Section 21 - Retaliatory Eviction Bill
The Tenancy Reform Bill "Retaliatory Eviction Bill " effectively failed in its initial reading however the proposed Restrictions of use on Section 21 Notice where property is claimed to be in disrepair have been moved to the proposed Deregulation BiIl
02/04/2015 The Deregulation Bill was granted Royal Assent 26th March 2015 - Some components are immediate with others to be phased in This Bill will result in significant changes in the way landlords are …
Read news
23/02/2015
Section 21 Notice Important Changes.......After a lengthy debate detailing many technicalities, the House of Lords passed the amendments to the Deregulation Bill which means that sooner, rather than later, “revenge evictions” will be illegal. …
Read news
What is Prevention of Service of Section 21
-
If the Tenant complains of
disrepair No section 21 may be relied upon until – the breach is remedied or deemed unproven
-
The key point is this is open to abuse – all the tenant has to do is make a spurious complaint pre service of Section 21 and this will delay eviction or invalidate eviction. Even a false claim will have to be investigated by the council ; this could take months and a
HHSRS inspection will probably be required
-
It is cited The Bill’s provisions would not apply retrospectively. For avoidance of doubt if passed the bill would ONLY apply to tenancies commenced after starting date of the act - so in theory incumbent problematic tenants could not abuse this legislation; but we have no doubt this will be subject to an appeal claiming contrary to a tenant human rights they are being treated disproportionately] this is a basis of qualification for
legal aid entitlement.
The policy rationale for the Bill is:
- To prevent tenants from feeling unable to complain about poor property conditions because they fear eviction. The Bill should also encourage landlords to keep their property in a decent condition and to comply with all legal obligations placed upon them, in order not to lose their right to rely on section 21.
In addition to tackling the issue of ‘retaliatory eviction’ the Bill is seeking to make changes to the section 21 notice procedure “to make the eviction process more straightforward for both landlords and tenants.” PIMS comment this statement is untrue as is Tenant have the right to complain under Housing Health and Safety Rating and where a Landlords fails to repair it is an act of harassment and exposes the landlord to compensation claims under Unlawful Eviction Act 1977
On 11 September 2014 Communities Minister, Stephen Williams, said that the Government would support the Bill:
That’s why we’re backing Sarah Teather’s Bill to outlaw revenge evictions once and for all - ensuring tenants do not face the prospect of losing their home simply because they’ve asked for essential repairs to be made.
Preventing retaliatory evictions (clause 1)
Clause 1 of the Bill would prevent a landlord from serving a section 21 notice on a tenant within 6 months of the service of a 'relevant notice' in relation to the dwelling. Relevant notices are defined in sub-clause 1(9) and include improvement notices, hazard awareness notices or a notice of emergency remedial action under the Housing Act 2004.
-
Where a landlord serves a section 21 notice it would be invalid if, before service, the tenant had made a 'relevant complaint' about the dwelling to the landlord or the local housing authority and, since service of the section 21 notice, the housing authority has served an improvement or hazard notice or a notice of emergency remedial action. A 'relevant complaint' is defined as a complaint made to the landlord in writing or to a local housing authority regarding the condition of the dwelling. Complaints may also be made to a person acting on behalf of the landlord in relation to the tenancy.
-
Tenants would be able to defend a landlord's claim for possession under section 21 of the 1988 Housing Act by establishing that, prior to the service of the notice, they had made a relevant complaint to the landlord or local housing authority and:
• the authority had not decided whether to inspect the dwelling or common parts; or
• the decision to inspect had been made but not yet carried out; or
• an inspection had been carried out but the decision to serve a notice had not yet been made; or • the decision to serve a notice had been made but not yet implemented.
-
The prohibition on service of a section 21 notice within 6 months of a local authority serving a 'relevant notice' would not apply where:
• the relevant notice has been revoked (as a result of being served in error); or
• the notice has been quashed under paragraph 15 of Schedule 1 to the 2004 Act; or
• an authority's refusal to revoke the notice has been reversed under paragraph 18 of Schedule 1 to the 2004 Act; or 10
-
There are other situations that apply
2.4 Time limits – section 21 notices and proceedings (clause 4)
Clause 4 makes changes to the timing for service of section 21 notices and the bringing of possession proceedings in relation to section 21 notices.
- It would prohibit the service of a section 21 notice in England within four months of the beginning of the tenancy. Where a replacement tenancy is issued (i.e. at the end of a fixed-term) it would not be possible to serve a section 21 notice until four months after the start of the replacement tenancy. 11
-
The clause also provides that proceedings for an order for possession may not be brought later than six months from the date of service of a notice under section 21(1) or section 21(4) of the Housing Act 1988. This would place a specific time limit on the period within which a landlord must start possession proceedings after serving a section 21 notice.
It is not unusual for landlords to serve a section 21 notice at the very beginning of a fixed-term tenancy. This practice could undermine the provisions in clauses 1 and 2 of the Bill which, for example, invalidate a section 21 notice where the tenant has made a relevant complaint beforehand. The provisions in clause 4 would prohibit this practice.
Compliance with prescribed legal requirements (clause 5)
Clause 5 would give the Secretary of State power to prescribe requirements (in England) relating to the condition of dwellings (including energy performance) and the health and safety of the occupants which, were a landlord to be in breach, would prevent them from serving a section 21 notice until the requirement was complied with.
Prescribed form of section 21 notices (clause 6)
The Secretary of State would gain a regulation making power to prescribe the form of a section 21 notice in England. Regulations made under clauses 4 and 5 would be subject to the negative procedure clause 7).
Apportionment of rent (clause 8)
Clause 8 would provide for apportionment of rent where a tenancy is brought to an end before the end of a period of the tenancy (under section 21) and tenant has paid rent in advance for this period. The tenant would be entitled to an apportionment of the rent paid to the landlord calculated in accordance with a formula. The clause provides that if an apportionment of rent has not been made, when a court considers whether to make a possession order under section 21 it would be obliged to order the landlord to pay the apportionment of rent to the tenant.
2.8 Application (clause 9)
The Bill’s provisions would not apply retrospectively. Clause 9 would provide for the Bill’s provisions to apply to assured shorthold tenancies granted on or after the date on which it is brought into force. The provisions would also not apply to periodic assured shorthold tenancies arising due to the expiry of a fixed-term tenancy entered into before the date of commencement.